While Coronavirus – COVID-19 falls outside the normal scope of L&RUK, in view of its widespread impact in this area it has been the subject of a number of posts.
Law & Religion UK is intended as a forum for what (we hope) is academically-rigorous exploration of the interactions between law and religion – broadly defined – together with the human rights issues associated with them. We are always interested in guest posts from colleagues in the field of law and religion.
We also welcome pertinent comments on current developments that reflect the views and opinions of their respective authors and meet the General Conditions applying to the site. However, those that do not meet those criteria or which are otherwise unidentifiable are unlikely to be published, especially comments that are abusive or defamatory. For more information see our comments policy below.
We write this blog because we’re passionate about our subject and – unlike some legal resources – it’s free to access and we aim to keep it that way.
if you’ve found the blog useful, might we suggest that you consider making a small donation to The Billable Hour? It’s the lawyers’ charity that raises money for Save the Children – and even a billable five minutes would help some of the most deprived children on the planet.
We welcome comments, subject to the following conditions:
- We will not publish comments that, in our opinion, are abusive, racist, homophobic, potentially defamatory or otherwise capable of offending the laws against hate speech – or common decency.
- Since L&RUK is intended as a blog for academic comment, those that add little to the academic debate on a particular issue are unlikely to be published.
- As a rule of thumb, we will not normally publish comments received more than fourteen days from the original day of posting.
- Anonymous comments will not be published.
Our decision as to whether or not a comment should be published is final.
Frank Cranmer & David Pocklington
The first part of this series of posts, “Net zero”, church heating, and the consistory courts – I, (24 May 2021), reviewed twelve judicial considerations of replacement heating schemes, most of which had been handed down post-February 2020, the date on which General Synod unexpectedly agreed to the “net zero by 2030” target for the Church of England’s greenhouse gas emissions. The judgment Re St. Thomas & St. Luke Dudley  ECC Wor 2, delivered on 5 May and circulated on 29 May 2021, was considered in the second part, “Net zero”, church heating, and the consistory courts – II. Here the Chancellor raised the fundamental issue how the consistory courts should approach cases involving the Church of England’s “net zero” target. These two contrasting approaches are discussed below, and areas of commonality explored. For completeness, a further two recent judgments are included in the Postscript.