The dilemma of discovering an “unwanted font”
In our post, They bury fonts, don’t they? we examined the origins of the practice of burying fonts, and the occasions on which this disposal route has been sought. Subsequently, Michael Ainsworth and I reviewed further judgments in our joint post “Burial and destruction of unwanted fonts – further clarification”. However, it is inevitable that, if in the past fonts have been buried, there is a possibility when building works are undertaken in a churchyard, such as at St Andrew’s Church, Chippenham, an unexpected buried font may be discovered.
The BBC reports that a medieval baptismal font has been found buried outside the main door of a church in Wiltshire. The 16th Century font was unearthed at St Andrew’s Church, Chippenham, during construction work in the churchyard. The font was replaced by the Victorians, when they reordered the church “a couple of hundred years ago.”
Whilst authority for the font’s original disposal may be difficult to source, now that it has been exhumed, a faculty will be required to approve any further action, as this option is unlikely to have been considered when the building works were first authorized. Although the incumbent is quoted as saying “[I]t will be up to the church authorities to decide what is done”, in fact it will be for those who commissioned the recent building works in the churchyard to seek a faculty for future action, following the advice of the DAC, CBC, and others.
The problem is now what is the best option for the disposal, in the broader sense of the word, with the sixteenth century, octagonal font and pedestal weighing one tonne. We would not presume to second guess the deliberations of the consistory court; however, we note that it is generally the bowl that is of concern rather than the plinth since this is the part addressed in Canon F 1 Of the font, a strict reading of which would preclude burial. As a consequence, it is often the bowl that is buried and not the entire font. The disposal of unwanted fonts is often problematic on account of their physical size and the lack of alternative options.
We await the consideration of the consistory court with interest.
Our church font had been used as a cattle trough at its last parish and rediscovered in the Nineteenth Century before being brought to this parish. I expect it had been discarded because of the pagan imagery on it.
Pingback: Ecclesiastical court judgments – March (II) | Law & Religion UK
Pingback: An Index of L&RUK Posts – Consistory Court Judgments | Law & Religion UK