The Coronation Claims Office

One of the more obscure byways of law and religion.

The Coronation of HM King Charles III will take place on Saturday 6 May. The Cabinet Office has announced that “In line with His Majesty’s wish for the event to be rooted in tradition but reflective of today, and in accordance with Government advice” it has created a Coronation Claims Office to consider claims to perform a historic or ceremonial role at the Coronation. It replaces the Court of Claims, which fulfilled a similar role for HM Queen Elizabeth II’s Coronation in 1953.

When looking at claims, the Coronation Claims Office will consider matters including whether or not the role or service was performed in 1953, what the basis is for it to be performed now and the claimant’s connection to those who previously performed the role or service.

Officials from the Coronation Claims Office will consult with ecclesiastical experts from Lambeth Palace and ceremonial experts from the Royal Household when considering claims.

All claims must be submitted in writing to the Coronation Claims Office by 5.30 pm on Friday 3 February 2023.

See also Victoria Ward, Daily Telegraph, King Charles keeps 700-year-old tradition as he issues call for Coronation claims.

Cite this article as: Frank Cranmer, "The Coronation Claims Office" in Law & Religion UK, 5 January 2023, https://lawandreligionuk.com/2023/01/05/the-coronation-claims-office/

10 thoughts on “The Coronation Claims Office

  1. Pingback: دفتر دعاوی تاج گذاری | قانون و دین انگلستان - ganjine-roshan

  2. I was wondering if the Court of Claims was a permanent or ad hoc institution, and found one reference to it in the Law Reports: Scrymgeour Wedderburn v Earl of Lauderdale [1910] AC 342, HL at p 343. There may be more reports in the Session Cases, of course.
    If I have time I will delve into this in more detail.

  3. It has been, apparently, a tradition, for 700 years or so, to do this sort of thing ad hoc, every time a monarch dies ad hoc, requiring his or her successor to be crowned if he or she lives long enough.

  4. The decision has been taken – incorrect I believe – that only peers who are members of the House of Lords will be entitled to enter into the ballot for attendance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *